Claude’s new file creation tools vs. ChatGPT and Gemini: who’s ahead on real productivity

What Claude offers now

From Anthropic’s announcements:

• Creates and edits real files directly in chats or the desktop app: Excel (.xlsx), Word (.docx), PowerPoint (.pptx), PDFs. 

• Users can upload data or supply shared input, then ask Claude to build files from scratch (e.g. spreadsheets with formulas, documents or slide decks). 

• The outputs are downloadable, usable “ready-to-use” artifacts. Claude can also convert document formats (e.g. PDF→slides) and do statistical/analysis tasks within spreadsheets.

• File size limits: up to 30 MB uploads/downloads. 

• The feature is currently a preview for certain paid plans (Max, Team, Enterprise), with Pro plans getting access “soon.” 

---

What ChatGPT currently supports (vs. Claude)

Based on public info:

• File uploads & summarization / extraction: ChatGPT can accept PDFs, presentations, plaintext documents, etc., and then respond to queries about their contents. 

• Data analysis / code execution environment (“Code Interpreter” / “Advanced Data Analysis”): for spreadsheets or CSVs, you can upload, have it run code, do charts/visualizations, clean data, etc. 

• File editing or direct file creation: ChatGPT so far does not create or modify Excel/Word/PPTX/PDF files as downloadable artifacts via a “create new file + edit” flow in chat (at least very broadly marketed). There are plugins and workflows, but not a core feature announced the way Claude’s was.

• Canvas interface: ChatGPT introduced “Canvas,” allowing inline editing of texts or code alongside chat—helpful for refining, rewriting, collaborating. But this is about editing text/code drafts in the interface, not necessarily generating formal document files with formatting and exporting to PPTX, XLSX, etc. 

---

What we know less about Gemini (Google)

• Public info is less detailed for Gemini’s ability to generate downloadable files like PowerPoints, spreadsheets with formulas, etc. Gemini can export Deep Research reports as Google Docs, which implies some document generation + formatting functionality. But whether it handles real .xlsx spreadsheets or retains formula logic is less clear. (This comes from secondary sources referencing export of reports as Google Docs.) 

• Gemini does well with research-style reports, text generation, multimedia input/output; but direct file editing workflows (upload file, edit content, download in formatted artifact) are not obviously at parity with Claude’s newly announced capability as of now (publicly).

---

Side-by-side strengths & gaps

Feature	Claude’s new file creation/edit	ChatGPT’s current capacities	Google Gemini (publicly known)
Create + download Word / PPTX / Excel / PDF from scratch via chat	✅ Yes (Claude)	❓ Mostly no / limited; chat drafts or upload → extract, but not full artifact creation with formatting & formulas	✅ Some doc export (e.g. Google Doc), but file formats & formula support unclear
Edit existing files (spreadsheets, slide decks, PDFs) by specifying edits	✅ Yes (Claude can modify uploaded file)	Partial: you can ask ChatGPT to suggest edits, maybe produce updated content; but usually via text, not editing the actual file artifact internally	Less clear publicly
Formulas / spreadsheet logic, charts, data analysis within file	✅ Claude supports formulas, chart generation in Excel sheets etc.	✅ ChatGPT’s Advanced Data Analysis / Code Interpreter can run code, generate charts etc., but output often image or code rather than in Excel with working formulas	Unknown detail for Gemini
Format preservation / bulk edits (e.g. replace terms, style, layout)	Claude claims it preserves formatting and supports direct editing without opening the file manually.	ChatGPT can manipulate content, but not always preserve all formatting when exporting to external files; often conversion‐based or re‐rendered text	Gemini likely similar to document export, with less file format variety known
File size & limits	Claude: upload/download up to ~30 MB.	ChatGPT file uploads also have size limits (for large files or large images), but the limit & support for editing artifacts with formulas or presentation layouts is more constrained	Not fully disclosed / varies across features / tools
Availability / plan restrictions	Preview for paid tiers in Claude; not yet general free access.	Many advanced features gated to Plus / Pro / Teams; “Canvas” is in beta etc.	Gemini similarly has tiered and regionized feature access; some users may have access, but not universally confirmed for all features

---

Implications & what this means

• Claude’s added file creation/edit increases its utility for document + presentation work flows, especially for business / enterprise use, where formatted deliverables (slides, reports, spreadsheets) are key.

• If ChatGPT (or Gemini) wants to match this, they'd need to support not just text/coding, but full artifact generation + editing with retention of formula logic/formatting + download/export in common office file formats.

• Users whose workflows involve formatting, layout, bulk edits, or converting between formats will benefit more from Claude’s new feature—less manual reformatting and fewer copy-paste hacks.

• For many use cases, existing tools (ChatGPT + Code Interpreter) suffice, especially when output is data or charts. But for file artifacts that are meant to be “finished” or shared, Claude’s offering tightens the gap.

Introducing Gemini 2.5 Flash Image — Fast, Consistent, and Context‑Aware Image Generation from Google

 Google has launched Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (codenamed nano‑banana), a powerful update to its image model offering fast generation, precise editing, and content-aware intelligence. The release builds on Gemini’s low-latency image generation, adding rich storytelling, character fidelity, and template reusability. The model is available now via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, and Vertex AI for developers and enterprises. 

Key Features & Capabilities

• Character Consistency: Maintain appearance across prompts—ideal for branding, storytelling, and product mockups.
  Example: Swap a character’s environment while preserving their look using Google AI Studio templates. 

• Prompt-Based Image Edits: Perform fine-grained edits using text, like blurring backgrounds, removing objects, changing poses, or applying color to B&W photos—all with a single prompt. 

• World Knowledge Integration: Understand diagrams, answer questions, and follow complex instructions seamlessly by combining vision with conceptual reasoning. 

• Multi-Image Fusion: Merge multiple inputs—objects into scenes, room restyling, texture adjustments—using drag-and-drop via Google AI Studio templates.

• Vibe‑Coding Experience: Pre-built template apps in AI Studio enable fast prototyping—build image editors by prompts and deploy or export as code. 

• Invisible SynthID Watermark: All generated or edited images include a non-intrusive watermark for AI provenance. 

---

Where to Try It

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image is offered through:

• Gemini API — ready for integration into apps.

• Google AI Studio — experiment with visual templates and exportable builds.

• Vertex AI — enterprise-grade deployment and scalability.
  It’s priced at $30 per 1 million output tokens (~$0.039 per image) and supports input/output pricing consistent with Gemini 2.5 Flash. 

---

Why It Matters

• Seamless creative iterations — Designers save time when characters, layouts, and templates stay consistent across edits.

• Smart editing with intuition — Natural-language edits reduce the complexity of pixel-level manipulation.

• Use-case versatility — From education to real estate mockups, creative marketing, and diagram analysis.

• Responsible AI use — Embedded watermarking helps with transparency and traceability.

Token Monster: Revolutionizing AI Interactions with Multi-Model Intelligence

 In the evolving landscape of artificial intelligence, selecting the most suitable large language model (LLM) for a specific task can be daunting. Addressing this challenge, Token Monster emerges as a groundbreaking AI chatbot platform that automates the selection and integration of multiple LLMs to provide users with optimized responses tailored to their unique prompts.

Seamless Multi-Model Integration

Developed by Matt Shumer, co-founder and CEO of OthersideAI and the creator of Hyperwrite AI, Token Monster is designed to streamline user interactions with AI. Upon receiving a user's input, the platform employs meticulously crafted pre-prompts to analyze the request and determine the most effective combination of available LLMs and tools to address it. This dynamic routing ensures that each query is handled by the models best suited for the task, enhancing the quality and relevance of the output.

Diverse LLM Ecosystem

Token Monster currently integrates seven prominent LLMs, including:

• Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet

• Anthropic Claude 3.5 Opus

• OpenAI GPT-4.1

• OpenAI GPT-4o

• Perplexity AI PPLX (specialized in research)

• OpenAI o3 (focused on reasoning tasks)

• Google Gemini 2.5 Pro

By leveraging the strengths of each model, Token Monster can, for instance, utilize Claude for creative endeavors, o3 for complex reasoning, and PPLX for in-depth research, all within a single cohesive response.

Enhanced User Features

Beyond its core functionality, Token Monster offers a suite of features aimed at enriching the user experience:

• File Upload Capability: Users can upload various file types, including Excel spreadsheets, PowerPoint presentations, and Word documents, allowing the AI to process and respond to content-specific queries.

• Webpage Extraction: The platform can extract and analyze content from webpages, facilitating tasks that require information synthesis from online sources.

• Persistent Conversations: Token Monster supports ongoing sessions, enabling users to maintain context across multiple interactions.

• FAST Mode: For users seeking quick responses, the FAST mode automatically routes prompts to the most appropriate model without additional input.

Innovative Infrastructure

Central to Token Monster's operation is its integration with OpenRouter, a third-party service that serves as a gateway to multiple LLMs. This architecture allows the platform to access a diverse range of models without the need for individual integrations, ensuring scalability and flexibility.

Flexible Pricing Model

Token Monster adopts a usage-based pricing structure, charging users only for the tokens consumed via OpenRouter. This approach offers flexibility, catering to both casual users and those requiring extensive AI interactions.

Forward-Looking Developments

Looking ahead, the Token Monster team is exploring integrations with Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Such integrations would enable the platform to access and utilize a user's internal data and services, expanding its capabilities to tasks like managing customer support tickets or interfacing with business systems.

A Novel Leadership Experiment

In an unconventional move, Shumer has appointed Anthropic’s Claude model as the acting CEO of Token Monster, committing to follow the AI's decisions. This experiment aims to explore the potential of AI in executive decision-making roles.

Conclusion

Token Monster represents a significant advancement in AI chatbot technology, offering users an intelligent, automated solution for interacting with multiple LLMs. By simplifying the process of model selection and integration, it empowers users to harness the full potential of AI for a wide array of tasks, from creative writing to complex data analysis.

Gemini 2.5 Flash AI Model Shows Safety Regression in Google’s Internal Tests

 A newly released technical report from Google reveals that its Gemini 2.5 Flash model performs worse on safety benchmarks compared to the earlier Gemini 2.0 Flash. Specifically, it demonstrated a 4.1% regression in text-to-text safety and a 9.6% drop in image-to-text safety—both automated benchmarks that assess whether the model’s responses adhere to Google’s content guidelines.

In an official statement, a Google spokesperson confirmed these regressions, admitting that Gemini 2.5 Flash is more likely to generate guideline-violating content than its predecessor.

The Trade-Off: Obedience vs. Safety

The reason behind this slip? Google’s latest model is more obedient—it follows user instructions better, even when those instructions cross ethical or policy lines. According to the report, this tension between instruction-following and policy adherence is becoming increasingly apparent in AI development.

This is not just a Google issue. Across the industry, AI companies are walking a fine line between making their models more permissive (i.e., willing to tackle sensitive or controversial prompts) and maintaining strict safety protocols. Meta and OpenAI, for example, have also made efforts to reduce refusals and provide more balanced responses to politically charged queries.

But that balance is tricky.

Why It Matters

Testing done via OpenRouter showed Gemini 2.5 Flash generating content that supports questionable ideas like replacing judges with AI and authorizing warrantless government surveillance—content that would normally violate safety norms.

Thomas Woodside of the Secure AI Project emphasized the need for greater transparency in model testing. While Google claims the violations aren’t severe, critics argue that without concrete examples, it's hard to evaluate the true risk.

Moreover, Google has previously delayed or under-detailed safety reports—such as with its flagship Gemini 2.5 Pro model—raising concerns about the company's commitment to responsible disclosure.

---

Takeaway:

Google’s Gemini 2.5 Flash model exposes a growing challenge in AI development: making models that are helpful without becoming harmful. As LLMs improve at following instructions, developers must also double down on transparency and safety. This incident underlines the industry-wide need for clearer boundaries, more open reporting, and better tools to manage ethical trade-offs in AI deployment.

Google’s Gemini Beats Pokémon Blue — A New Milestone in AI Gaming

Google’s most advanced language model, Gemini 2.5 Pro, has achieved an impressive feat — completing the iconic 1996 GameBoy title Pokémon Blue. While the accomplishment is being cheered on by Google executives, the real driver behind the milestone is independent developer Joel Z, who created and live-streamed the entire experience under the project “Gemini Plays Pokémon.”

Despite not being affiliated with Google, Joel Z’s work has garnered praise from top Google personnel, including AI Studio product lead Logan Kilpatrick and even CEO Sundar Pichai, who posted excitedly on X about Gemini’s win.

How Did Gemini Do It?

Gemini didn’t conquer the game alone. Like Anthropic’s Claude AI, which is attempting to beat Pokémon Red, Gemini was assisted by an agent harness — a framework that provides the model with enhanced, structured inputs such as game screenshots, contextual overlays, and decision-making tools. This setup helps the model “see” what’s happening and choose appropriate in-game actions, which are then executed via simulated button presses.

Although developer interventions were needed, Joel Z insists this wasn't cheating. His tweaks were aimed at enhancing Gemini’s reasoning rather than offering direct answers. For example, a one-time clarification about a known game bug (involving a Team Rocket member and the Lift Key) was the closest it came to outside help.

“My interventions improve Gemini’s overall decision-making,” Joel Z said. “No walkthroughs or specific instructions were given.”

He also acknowledged that the system is still evolving and being actively developed — meaning Gemini’s Pokémon journey might just be the beginning.

---

Takeaway:

Gemini’s victory over Pokémon Blue is not just a nostalgic win — it’s a symbol of how far LLMs have come in real-time reasoning and interaction tasks. However, as Joel Z points out, these experiments should not be treated as performance benchmarks. Instead, they offer insight into how large language models can collaborate with structured tools and human-guided systems to navigate complex environments, one decision at a time.